Lead-offs run-off voting

Play ball! Then talk about it. Or vice versa.
Post Reply

Lead-Offs Run-Off Voting

Lead-offs allowed, using a marker
3
33%
No Lead-offs allowed
6
67%
 
Total votes: 9

User avatar
retep
Player/Manager
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:02 am
Location: Berkeley
Contact:

Lead-offs run-off voting

Post by retep »

So, in my previous topic, I asked what we should do, either have no lead offs, have defense pitch and allow leads/pickoffs, or have a designated marker showing how far of a lead one can take.

in a close race, those options got 3, 2, and 3 votes respectfully. So, now, we have a run-off between having lead-off markers, or still no leadoffs at all, even on the lager fields.

This poll won't make a final decision: its just a poll.

Also, I feel that any changes to create lead-offs will just apply to larger fields.
User avatar
BostonMike
Team Captain
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: Boston's My Home, But I Live In Emeryville

Re: Lead-offs run-off voting

Post by BostonMike »

retep wrote:Also, I feel that any changes to create lead-offs will just apply to larger fields.
I don't think there should be any led-offs just for the reason with the pitching. Maybe a poll in defensive pitching or leave it how it is, should be made.
User avatar
Baseball=Life
Baseball Deity
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 11:16 pm
Location: SF, CA

...........

Post by Baseball=Life »

Yo, I've changed my mind, I'm now against lead-offs even with a marker. I'd rather move the bases in at Raimondi than allow leadoffs.

Imagine bases loaded........................ it will be very, very difficult to ensure people stick to the markers.


And as for the balks issue, when you're batting you don't want to have to take into account whether your baserunners were balked into leaning the wrong way. It doesn't take a dive back to the bag, only a lean, for a runner to be DOA at 2nd on a sharp basehit to CF.

We shouldn't fix what ain't broke. Move the bases in a bit at Raimondi if it remains an issue. But there's some merit to the notion that, when playing there, the majority of ground balls resulting in outs at 1st is a good thing, since the Raimondi experience involves going for MLB-like baseball.
"Baseball is like church, many attend, few understand"

- Leo Durocher
User avatar
Baseball=Life
Baseball Deity
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 11:16 pm
Location: SF, CA

Yep, still no leadoffs

Post by Baseball=Life »

After we've now played our first full 9 innings game at Raimondi, it seems clear that we don't need to allow leadoffs. The forceouts at 2nd only happened on routine grounders, and happened no more than would occur normally. And this was in wet conditions when people are inherently slower runners.


We saw someone go first to third on a basehit and make it (Kenyatte), and one come very close to making it (Daniel). And we also saw Peter score from 2nd base on a basehit to CF.

So, it appears the no-leadoffs rule isn't hurting baserunning that much.
"Baseball is like church, many attend, few understand"

- Leo Durocher
User avatar
BostonMike
Team Captain
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: Boston's My Home, But I Live In Emeryville

Post by BostonMike »

I agree with you Scott, plus I think people know when to run just by sensing what type of hit it was, or if it's gonna drop or be caught.
Well I Love That Dirty Water, O O Boston Your My Home

He Takes The Thunder From The Mountains
He Takes The Lightning From The Sky
He Brings A Strong Man To His Begging Knee
He Makes A Young Girl's Mama Cry
Post Reply