I was wondering if we should agree on some regulations for bat, since there is a wide variety available, some supposed improving performance significantly.
While it is probably not important to look at length, or those super-duper construction features that can add $50-100 to the cost, we might want to specify a minimum weight. Otherwise someone could use an ultralight, little-league type bat, get really high bat speed and possibly injure the pitcher, not to mention artificially improve their chances of an extra-base hit.
We mostly seem to use -3, maybe we should follow the college leagues' lead and adopt that as our minimum weight ratio. If you want to keep the weight down, you have to get a shorter bat, so the bat speed advantage you gain is probably made up for by reduced reach and turning moment (that's torque to you Yanks).
Wood bats I think we can keep unregulated, even those weird composite
ones.
Thoughts?
Bat regulations (for aluminum bats)
Bat regulations (for aluminum bats)
Rule Britannia!
Re: Bat regulations (for aluminum bats)
Or some particularly inscrupulous person could use a thin, light fungo type bat?!tallguy wrote: Otherwise someone could use an ultralight, little-league type bat, get really high bat speed and possibly injure the pitcher, not to mention artificially improve their chances of an extra-base hit.

Baseball is 90% mental, the other half is physical --Yogi Berra
- Southpaw Slim
- Kenesaw Mountain Landis
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:36 pm
- Location: Oakland, CA
- Contact:
As far as wooden bats are concerned, I use a $20 Rawlings bat. I've only broken one in 2 years. I even hit sharp golf-ball-and-smaller-sized rocks with one for 2-3 hours with no splintering or cracking. Those are cool to hit, cuz they whir as they fly.
I intended to write something to remind everybody of my superior prowess.