Page 1 of 2
Hall of Fame 2006: Sutter in!
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:11 am
by gohlkus
Just announced on MLB.com radio: Bruce Sutter was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame with 400 votes (76.9%) -- just enough to get in.
From the story on
MLB.com :
Jim Rice and Rich "Goose" Gossage, who many thought had a chance this time around, garnered 64.8 percent and 64.6 percent, respectively. Andre Dawson, with 61 percent, was the only other player on the ballot who received 60 or more percent of the vote.
...
Any possibility of Rice, Gossage or Dawson making it will dwindle in 2007, the year Tony Gwynn, Cal Ripken Jr. and Mark McGwire are eligible for the first time.
Too bad Gossage and Dawson didn't get in... but I'm glad Sutter did.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:13 pm
by Baseball=Life
I hope that McGwire doesn't make it into the Hall. What a punk-azz beotch he is.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:14 pm
by retep
Jim Rice and Rich "Goose" Gossage were my fist two picks. I fel Sutter's career wa a bit too short.
Sad to see Will Clark and Millie McGee get kicked of the ballots, though neither had a chance
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 4:52 pm
by gohlkus
The longevity argument is a good point, but apparently sportswriters agreed that:
1. Sutter was dominant in the years he was good
2. he pioneered BOTH
a. a new role (closer, differently than the modern-day ones, of course) and
b. the splitter, which has massively changed pitching
All those 3 things seem to override the longevity concern. I agree with that judgement.
I think Goose will get in, eventually and deservedly, especially now that Sutter is in. Rice, Dawson -- I dunno. Blyleven, Smith -- looking like probably not.
Yeah, fuck McGwire. It'll be really interesting to see what happens considering how recently the steroid shit has blown up. I'd be kind of amazed if Ripken gets less than 97% and Gwynn gets less than 94% next year. McGwire will be lucky to get 75%. Maybe more like 60%.
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:31 am
by joe shmoe
well on the McGwire note do you hate cause he took the juice or cuase he would admit to it
sad fact of the matter is that most players do and way more stars (Palmerio, Canceso, just as some stars that come to mind) do
you know bonds did should he get in he is clearly juiced
but his stats dont lie most HRs in a seasonand you know who is right be hing BIG MAC
maybe i just like another red haired slugger
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:31 am
by joe shmoe
well on the McGwire note do you hate cause he took the juice or cuase he won't admit to it
sad fact of the matter is that most players do and way more stars (Palmerio, Canceso, just as some stars that come to mind) do
you know bonds did should he get in he is clearly juiced
but his stats dont lie most HRs in a seasonand you know who is right be hing BIG MAC
maybe i just like another red haired slugger
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:26 am
by retep
Well, Big Mac only hit HRs! He hardly did anything else... small AVG, no speed, minimal defense... the steroid issue is bigger for him than say for Bonds... You could take away 300 of Barry's HR's and he is still a first ballot HOFer!
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:58 pm
by AntMoOAK
How can Sutter get in but not Lee Smith who is the career leader in Sutter's category. How does Goose Gossage not get in ? Well he probably never get in now with his whining about not getting in. Here's hoping Smith, Gooden, Jim Rice and my underdog fave Dale Murphy get in or at least a good number of votes in '08 ('07 is a wash). The Baseball Writers of America has to be the stodgiest and stuck up collection of people around.
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:02 pm
by AntMoOAK
Actually Peter... Big Mac was an above average 1st baseman for most of his career (pre- StL) with a career .993 and a GG in 1990. Only Mattingly was better for a number of years
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:37 pm
by tallguy
Hah! 1st base. Big deal.
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:47 pm
by retep
AntMoOAK wrote:How can Sutter get in but not Lee Smith who is the career leader in Sutter's category. How does Goose Gossage not get in ?
Thank you!!!
And, thanks for the info on Big Mac. It's fair points, but the fact remains is that comparing him to Bonds is thin, at best. it's like comparing Eddie Grabell to Rickey Henderson for OBP!
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:44 pm
by joe schmoe
i did NOT mean to compare their stats directly only that they are/ were two of the best power hitters in the game while bonds numbers are better. ihust meant that they both juiced clearly
big mac is a clear 1st ballot HOFer
with a career Avg of 263, obp 394, slg 588 hrs 583 rbis 1414
while 263 avg is decent of a power hitter 394 obp is really good
oh yeah 10 mvps and 12 allstars the ROY (only once duh!)
if you want more stats go to
www.baseball-reference.com
really cool site with every players stats just enter mark mcgwire
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:24 am
by retep
joe schmoe wrote:
oh yeah 10 mvps and 12 allstars the ROY (only once duh!)
Uh.. Ten?
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:46 am
by AntMoOAK
Yeah Mr. Shmoe... No MVP's - came as close as second in 1998. That list you're looking at is a ranking
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:02 pm
by retep
Regarding Lee Smith, i feel that if you lead in career anything (positive) then you gotta be in the HOF. No?