Page 1 of 1

Career W-L records

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:41 pm
by Pat K
Career W-L (Min 60AB & only boxscores since 1/30/05)

Winning Percent/ Games played

=1# Dorian/.714/14
=1# Pat K/.714/14
3# Jason/.636/11
4# James/.625/16
5# Paul/.609/23
6# David L./.571/14
7# Daniel/.583/12
8# Ken/.545/22
9# Chris/.500/20
10# Nick/.455/22
11# Peter/.421/19
12# Rob/.409/22
13# Scott/.391/23
14# Will/.357/14
15# Rich/.334/12

Interesting

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:08 pm
by Baseball=Life
Hey Pat, thanks a lot for compiling this!! I had a suspicion that I had a low winning percentage, and now it's verified! What a fucking loser I am!!!!! (Yes, everyone can now quote me on that remark.)

I'm still in shock about game 2 yesterday. I would never have guessed that a team that had Paul, Carlos, and Anthony (plus others) would be held to only 16 runs at DeFremery. It makes me wonder whether splitting the teams up in a balance-conscious fashion makes a difference. Jason said to me that, more times than not, it ends up creating balance, and I guess that's true. But It's also not the first time seemingly balanced teams resulted in a blowout. Hmmm. I suppose I'll make further comments on this issue under Pat's thread about semi-permanent teams.

Thanks again for compiling the win/loss percentages.

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:14 pm
by retep
This way, the outcome of the game can't be bitched about, "We had no good players... blah blah." This way, it's on the players to do well. Keep the system! 8)

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:36 pm
by Baseball=Life
So Peter you're saying keep the status quo? Ie no semi-permanent teams?

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:49 pm
by retep
I just ment keeping the teams balanced. That was my one and only point.

Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:14 pm
by BostonMike
How are you keeping the score on which team players win? I mean do you have a seperate column for winning teams? If so where am I??

wat bout me

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 10:15 pm
by da peoples champ
y is it dat im only 5 at bats short but my stats never show up for any damn thing........

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:17 pm
by retep
Maybe because you are 5 at-bats short? :?: :idea: