July 5th Doubleheader Boxscores

Talk about your numbers and your blast over the trees in right field.
User avatar
Southpaw Slim
Kenesaw Mountain Landis
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:36 pm
Location: Oakland, CA
Contact:

Post by Southpaw Slim »

Yeah, I knew it was back-to-back singles to left before the last out. Thanks.
I intended to write something to remind everybody of my superior prowess.
User avatar
Southpaw Slim
Kenesaw Mountain Landis
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:36 pm
Location: Oakland, CA
Contact:

Post by Southpaw Slim »

Thanks, Ken. It's all updated.

Before you start running your outcomes to batters equation on game 2, I'll point out that Richard had a sac fly in the 1st.

Also, your original formula still won't line up. The reason is that Kevin was thrown out at third by yours truly after Homer's single in the 2nd inning.
I intended to write something to remind everybody of my superior prowess.
User avatar
TheLegend
Babe Ruth
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:15 am
Location: Oakland, duh.
Contact:

Post by TheLegend »

lol. i'm aware. thanks.

edit: but for the record, i did take Kevin's out at third into account.
Joe shmoe
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 275
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:38 am
Location: Oakland

Post by Joe shmoe »

i didnt go 3 for 4 in the second game

i went 4 for 4 with a sac fly 3 singles and a double
So long, and thanks for all the fish. - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Southpaw Slim
Kenesaw Mountain Landis
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:36 pm
Location: Oakland, CA
Contact:

Post by Southpaw Slim »

I'll have to look at the sheet when I get home. I may have forgotten to add your hit in the 6th.

Edit: Sorry, Richard. You were out in the 2nd inning of that game.
I intended to write something to remind everybody of my superior prowess.
Joe shmoe
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 275
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:38 am
Location: Oakland

Post by Joe shmoe »

yes but that was a sac fly
So long, and thanks for all the fish. - Douglas Adams
User avatar
TheLegend
Babe Ruth
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:15 am
Location: Oakland, duh.
Contact:

Post by TheLegend »

it looks like your SF is already accounted for as you have fewer at bats then the people behind you in the lineup, although imo, it should appear in the notes for clarity. Perhaps you had an roe or a fc?

on a related note: who thinks our boxscores should have a sac column?
User avatar
Baseball=Life
Baseball Deity
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 11:16 pm
Location: SF, CA

Post by Baseball=Life »

I definitely think you need to get a sac, Ken. haha

But really, good call on a SAC column (combine SF and SBs in one column?).
"Baseball is like church, many attend, few understand"

- Leo Durocher
Post Reply